Beehive Bridge: Project Profile

What are the vital statistics of the project? (This includes project type, size, stage of design or construction, project team, etc.)

Project type: Bridge Renovation and Public Art Installation 
Location: New Britain, CT 
Stage: Project is in final inspections 
Client: City of New Britain 

Project team

  • Fuss & O’Neill – Engineering and Traffic 
  • Svigals + Partners – Architectural Design and Artwork 
  • Richter & Cegan – Landscape Architecture 
  • Atelier Ten – Lighting Design 
  • Laviero Contractors - General Contractor
  • SignPro Inc – Fabricator 

The “Beehive Bridge” is a 265-foot-long highway overpass in the city of New Britain, Connecticut, connecting the two parts of the city that are divided by a highway. Svigals + Partner created a design scheme for a pedestrian-friendly streetscape with an abstract take on the “beehive” theme that has long been associated with New Britain—it features colorful translucent panels in an abstract honeycomb pattern that separate the overpass visually from the highway below (Figure 1). In shades of gold and yellow, the panels produce a variety of patterns and colors depending on the time of day and position of the sun. Building on the theme, the design then incorporates contemporary artwork integrated directly into the structure: four large-format stainless-steel honeybee sculptures, and an outsized beehive in the center of the bridge. Energy-efficient LED lighting illuminates the bridge, ensuring safety for pedestrians and cyclists after dark.

Which were the main software applications used for this project, and how were they used?

The two main software applications used were Rhino and Revit. Rhino was used for early massing studies of the bridge railing and the development of the sculptural elements (Figure 2). We then moved to Revit for the development of the bridge railing and project documentation (Figure 3). 

To optimize the process of documenting the railing design, it was important for the team to keep all production work in a single program. Keeping all our design exploration and creation of the construction document set in Revit allowed for efficient modifications of design that could be immediately translated to the drawings.

Did the project have a specific approach or methodology for the application of AEC technology?

As a firm specializing in architecturally-integrated art, a combination of physical and digital modeling is essential to our design process. The use of Rhino allowed us to quickly develop, test, and template sculptural forms in 3D before building physical models in paper, metal, and resin.

The irregular shape of the rail was defined by its curving grid and triangular panels with edges supported by steel posts (Figure 4). Using advanced Revit modeling techniques, we created smart forms and components with the use of parameters and adaptive modeling.  Adaptive components were employed to smoothly manipulate the triangular families into different positions on the railing grid, following parametric rules and adapting to multiple insertion points, and creating a synchronized geometry of triangular panels repeating on an organic curve (Figure 5).

This technique allowed for easier manipulation of the curve radius and creation of multiple panel modules that flexibly adapt to various curve conditions.  As a result, the team explored multiple design alternatives with very quick turnaround times.

Would you consider this project to be an example of the cutting-edge use of technology? If so, how and why?

While parametric modeling in Revit has been around for a while, this was our office’s first venture into this type of computational design. It offered us powerful tools to streamline the workflow. Since this bridge is experienced at close range by pedestrians and from afar by vehicular traffic, the scale of the panels and feel of the curve played a crucial role in how the bridge is perceived and experienced.

In search of the ideal form, multiple analyses of the railing curvature were performed, including review of various individual panel sizes, post spacing, and curve radii (Figure 6). This was also the first time we used Rhino models to create final details in our construction documents. 

What are some of the main challenges you faced in your implementation of AEC technology on this project?

From the preliminary design stage, the team was aware that the unique shape of the railing would require close coordination with the contractors. With the number of individual elements to be documented, the use of the Alias plug-in provided the ability to flatten the curve and extract individual panel dimensions, while Revit provided the documentation of the geometry. Since no two panels are alike, this was an exciting step toward providing a simplified layout for the fabricator to utilize in production.

The fabricator ended up using our Revit model itself, which helped convey the complexity and feasibility of the design. The collaborative approach between teams resulted in a smooth construction process and a perfectly executed design.

Were there any requirements on this project that were not addressed by currently available technologies?

Each panel of the railing is unique, so there are very few identical components in this design. One thing we would do differently in the future is to create an automated scheduling or categorization of individual parts.

Any additional information/observations/insights on the use of AEC technology for this project that you would like to share?

Because the parametric model and Rhino models were developed with a high level of precision, our files were a valuable resource for fabrication teams. The availability of digital files cut down on development time for the fabrication engineers, ultimately lowering the cost of the project.

Acknowledgments: The responses to the questions for this profile were provided by Svigals + Partners. The profile was facilitated by Adam Sullivan of C.C. Sullivan.


Have comments or feedback on this article? Visit its AECbytes blog posting to share them with other readers or see what others have to say.

AECbytes content should not be reproduced on any other website, blog, print publication, or newsletter without permission.

Selected Earlier Articles

Thornton Tomasetti

CORE Studio: AEC Technology Development at Thornton Tomasetti

This article explores the cutting-edge AEC technology applications developed by CORE Studio, a dedicated software development group at Thornton Tomasetti. The applications including Konstru, Swarm, Asterisk, Trace, and many more for design, analysis, collaboration and visualization.

Layer software

Layer: Capturing and Organizing Building Data

Layer is a new AEC application that was launched close to six months ago to address what seems to be an obvious need in the industry—organizing and integrating the vast amount of disparate data that is typically collected on site during the retrofit or construction of a building project.

Merdeka 118

Merdeka 118: Project Profile

Fender Katsalidis describes the implementation of AEC technology on the “Merdeka 118” project, a 118-storey, mega-tall skyscraper under construction in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Upon completion, it will become the tallest building in Malaysia and Southeast Asia, and the second-tallest building in the world.

Social Distance Modelling

Social Distance Modelling for COVID

This article describes the research that was conducted by a team at the Technical University of Denmark to study the impact of COVID-19 on the passenger flow in the Copenhagen Metro, using passenger flow data and station floorplan drawings as well as Bentley Legion software for simulation of pedestrian flow.